Login


Wolfe Publishing Group
    Menu

    Everybody Loves Velocity

    The 4,500-fps WSSM Project

    The 223 WSSM rifle used in testing featured a regular short-action Model 70 with a 26-inch Douglas barrel and a 1:14-inch twist for optimal use with light bullets. The stock is a factory Winchester synthetic stock and the scope was a Tasco 4-16x World Class model.
    The 223 WSSM rifle used in testing featured a regular short-action Model 70 with a 26-inch Douglas barrel and a 1:14-inch twist for optimal use with light bullets. The stock is a factory Winchester synthetic stock and the scope was a Tasco 4-16x World Class model.
    Four .22-caliber bullets on the light end of the spectrum were used in the Mach IV project with the .223 WSSM: (1) Speer 30-grain TNT Green, (2) Hornady 35-grain NTX, (3) Nosler 40-grain Ballistic Tip and (4) Hornady 52-grain ELD-X match bullet.
    Four .22-caliber bullets on the light end of the spectrum were used in the Mach IV project with the 223 WSSM: (1) Speer 30-grain TNT Green, (2) Hornady 35-grain NTX, (3) Nosler 40-grain Ballistic Tip and (4) Hornady 52-grain ELD-X match bullet.
    There were six vehicles lined up along a dirt road on the edge of an irrigated pasture. About 15 of us were shooting at Columbian ground squirrels in the lush spring grass. The locals call this species of ground squirrel “gophers,” and they are little targets, especially the “young-of-the-year” juveniles, which probably have less than a one-inch vital area cross section. We started with semi-automatic .22 rimfires until we had eliminated or educated all the squirrels within 75 yards or so. Then we unlimbered the bigger centerfires in a wide variety of calibers. The game switched to a team sport where we alternated between being on the trigger and on a spotting scope or binoculars looking for likely targets. We almost universally agreed that it was more fun spotting than shooting because view of the target was usually lost at the moment of bullet impact for the shooter.
    It is not very often a shooter sees a chronograph reading top the Mach IV mark of 4,500 fps with a varmint round. The .223 WSSM did it handily with the light Speer 30-grain TNT Green bullets and CFE 223 powder.
    It is not very often a shooter sees a chronograph reading top the Mach IV mark of 4,500 fps with a varmint round. The 223 WSSM did it handily with the light Speer 30-grain TNT Green bullets and CFE 223 powder.

    The group contained one southerner with a strong accent and an infectious laugh and I was spotting for him. I particularly remember one shot where the ground squirrel cartwheeled high into the air. I quickly found another squirrel and directed him to the target.

    He calmly turned back to the riflescope and proceeded to shoot another squirrel. Obviously, he was focused on the task at hand.

    If the truth was told (and it would be profoundly politically incorrect to tell the truth), that is one of the key attractions of varmint hunting for small vermin: Seeing their reaction to a high-speed bullet.

    This sort of flies in the face of today’s most pernicious rage, namely that we all need to shoot varmints with long, skinny bullets launched out of barrels with fast twists and moderate velocities. Really? How many of us really need a stabilized, high ballistic coefficient (BC) bullet to make those 500-plus-yard shots on varmints?

    The highest velocity achieved with the .223 WSSM was with the diminutive Speer 30-grain TNT Green (non-lead) bullet. It met and surpassed the Mach IV goal of the test, bettering the 4,500 fps Mach IV threshold by 200 fps.
    The highest velocity achieved with the .223 WSSM was with the diminutive Speer 30-grain TNT Green (non-lead) bullet. It met and surpassed the Mach IV goal of the test, bettering the 4,500 fps Mach IV threshold by 200 fps.
    Most of us can’t hit a small, varmint-sized target past 250 yards under field conditions where the wind always seems to be gusting. Living in the West, where long shots indeed can present themselves, most of the varmints I’ve shot have been from 25 feet to 250 yards from the end of the gun barrel. If the wind is breezing, I seem to miss as many ground squirrels as I hit past 150 yards, even with all the gizmos, technology, and tack-driving rifles. These are little targets and I might not miss by much, but a miss is a miss.

    For example, a 6.5mm Creedmoor with a 143-grain, .625 BC bullet going 2,700 feet per second (fps) at the muzzle will drift a little over 2 inches at 200 yards, and that is computed with a mild, almost unnoticeable 10-mph breeze coming across at about 90 degrees from the barrel. At 300 yards, the drift is more than 5 inches. In real shooting situations, where wind is not only gusting, but is likely different between you and the target, hunters are mostly guessing where to hold even if we have a good wind gauge.

    I once hit a ground squirrel at a laser measured 311 yards with a 17 HMR. It took 14 shots! I swear there were some bullet strikes that were feet from the target. Worst of all, when I did luckily center punch it as it sat upright looking around, it ran off to its burrow. A buddy once said, “Our job is to kill these rodents humanely, not torture or maim them. Doing it spectacularly is an added bonus.”

    You can shoot at those 600-yard squirrels if you want, but wait and one will pop-up a lot closer and offer an opportunity for a surer shot and more impressive bullet performance.

    The stubby Speer 30-grain TNT Green bullet produced mediocre accuracy out of the .223 WSSM.
    The stubby Speer 30-grain TNT Green bullet produced mediocre accuracy out of the 223 WSSM.
    Once upon a time, it wasn’t taboo to note such things. Look at the names of some of popular varmint bullets. They really paint an honest picture: BlitzKing, Varmint Grenade, TNT. When varmint hunters talk about “launching one downrange,” they might not be speaking about the bullet exiting the
    The .223 WSSM built on a Model 70 action and Douglas barrel was capable of excellent accuracy as this .77-inch group shows. This load featured a Hornady  52-grain ELD Match bullet ahead of 48 grains of Vihtavuori N560 powder. It zipped along at 3,900 fps.
    The 223 WSSM built on a Model 70 action and Douglas barrel was capable of excellent accuracy as this .77-inch group shows. This load featured a Hornady 52-grain ELD Match bullet ahead of 48 grains of Vihtavuori N560 powder. It zipped along at 3,900 fps.
    barrel; they might be talking about the target’s effects after bullet impact. I always thought “Cartwheel King” and “Mr. Mister,” would be great names for varmint bullets.

    A highly-frangible bullet (whether it is a soft-lead, thin-jacketed bullet or one of the new lead-free amalgams) doesn’t have to go terribly fast to create spectacular results. However, faster IS better. Let’s be honest, everyone likes screamer cartridges.

    Several different powders were chosen with burn rates that were ideal for lighter bullets in the .223 WSSM case.
    Several different powders were chosen with burn rates that were ideal for lighter bullets in the 223 WSSM case.

    Considering all this, my old friend Charlie Merritt decided to build himself a true varmint hunter’s rifle with the Mach IV in mind. After shooting my first California ground squirrel with his gun, I started calling it his “performance queen.” It puts on a spectacular show.

    Merritt’s gun is chambered for the 223 Winchester Super Short Magnum (WSSM). Introduced in 2003, the new round was envisioned to be fast, perhaps the fastest .22 ever. It has a greater case capacity than any other factory .22 centerfire on the market (see table I). This is what attracted Merritt to the cartridge. While he didn’t intend to shoot ultra-speed rounds all the time through the rifle, he wanted to have the performance option available for select shots.

    Winchester could easily have brought out the 223 WSSM with a 40-grain factory load at 4,350 or 4,400 fps, laying outright claim to the speed championship. Instead, factory loads focused on 55-grain and heavier bullets. It wanted to tap into the interest in shooting heavier (64 grains and up) bullets like those shot in .223 AR-type rifles. There might have also been concern the new round would be saddled with the “barrel burner” moniker, just like the 220 Swift had battled. It didn’t matter that a 22-250 shot with hot loads could burn up a barrel just as quickly. But this was not a common sense discussion.

    The .223 WSSM (left) has the largest case capacity of any factory .22-caliber varmint round on the market, including the .22-250 (center) and the .220 Swift (right). It also easily exceeds the top velocities produced by those rounds when handloading to safe pressures.
    The 223 WSSM (left) has the largest case capacity of any factory .22-caliber varmint round on the market, including the 22-250 (center) and the 220 Swift (right). It also easily exceeds the top velocities produced by those rounds when handloading to safe pressures.
    Most non-AR centerfire .22s on the market have 1:12 twist barrels, but Winchester found this twist rate would not stabilize its 64-grain or heavier bullets, so it settled on a 1:10 twist to solve the problem. Factory loads were made to launch the 64-grain bullet at around 3,600 fps and the 55 grainer at 3,850 fps. While that is impressive, it doesn’t sound like much more than .22-250s deliver. Oh, but it can be.

    With the 223 WSSM, it is not too difficult to generate 4,500 fps with some of our lightest bullets on the market. Look at the factory-generated handloading data for this cartridge and you can easily see it reaches that goal. Having no interest in shooting 62-grain, 68-grain, or heavier .22 bullets, Merritt screwed on a 1:14 twist barrel before chambering up the rifle. I shot some discontinued Federal factory loads with 69-grain bullets and they went through the target sideways. Merritt had no intention of shooting anything over 50 or 55 grains through the gun.

    There is a conventional thought process that suggests a faster twist barrel will have less velocity than a slower twist barrel. So theoretically, the 1:14 twist would have more velocity than a 1:7 – all other things being equal – because the bullet is grinding against the barrel more as it is spinning. That friction is working against generating more speed, theoretically.

    “We have no data to back that up,” said Justin Shrader, a ballistician with Hodgdon powder. Shrader said Hodgdon has done limited testing on this subject. It suggested the impact on speed caused by different twist rates, “is so minute that we can’t perceive it.”

    The .223 WSSM action allowed for the bullets to be seated further out than is possible with the Winchester Super Short models.
    The .223 WSSM action allowed for the bullets to be seated further out than is possible with the Winchester Super Short models.

    Shrader said they’ve “looked at the issue a little bit because the logical brain says it has to go slower.”

    He went on to explain the gun is a complete system with many variables that can impact velocity, from chamber and neck sizes, to throat dimensions, to the brass and components used. In its limited testing, Hodgdon was unable to isolate bullet twist as a factor in velocity. He didn’t say it couldn’t be a factor, but it certainly isn’t a huge one that would be obvious in testing. Merritt went with the 1:14 twist, just in case.

    The selected loads in the table with this story all focus on bullets on the light end of the spectrum that work well with a 1:14 twist. They ranged from the Speer 30-grain TNT Green and the Hornady 35-grain NTX bullet, to the 40-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip varmint and up to the Hornady 52-grain ELD-X Match bullet. They were used with seven different powders, including IMR-4166 and CFE 223, Alliant’s 2000-MR, Ramshot’s Big Game and 2700 and Shooter’s World Long Rifle. While all of the loads listed are below the maximums listed by powder manufacturers for these bullet weights, they should all be approached with an abundance of caution. A couple of what I thought would be midrange loads (not shown in the table) based on published data were clearly too hot for this rifle and led to stiff bolt lifts.

    It was not a surprise to find the stubby, Speer 30-grain bullet, arguably designed for the 22 Hornet, did not shoot spectacular groups in the test gun. It sure did churn out the speed (and not come apart in transit). I used CFE 223 to try to gin up maximum velocity because Hodgdon’s load data for this powder in the 223 WSSM shows it generated the highest velocity for 35-grain bullets. I didn’t exceed the maximum top load listed for the 35-grain bullet with the test 30-grain load, but the top velocity was 4,700-plus fps.

    Obviously, these loads are not meant for long sessions shooting ground squirrels or prairie dogs. Loading 40- to 55-grain bullets at 3,500 to 3,700 fps would extend barrel life, and the “screamer” loads could be saved for special shots or coyote hunting. The reality is that a shooter can do the same thing with the .22-250 and a number of the hot .22 wildcats on the market. Plus, there is something pretty special about knowing you are starting a bullet out in excess of Mach IV (roughly 4,500 fps) and seeing the chronograph measure up that speed for the first time is a memorable experience.

    Merritt’s Mach IV gun was built on a regular Winchester Model 70 short action, not the Super Short action. His 223 WSSM has a “snug” chamber and the 1:14 twist and the barrel is an air-gauged Douglas that is 26-inches long. It features a factory Winchester stock.

    My testing was mostly done during howling winds and groups suffered, but readers can see that some of the loads still shot very well, especially under these conditions. I texted Merritt a photo of the chronograph reading when I was shooting the 30-grain bullets and he immediately called me, chuckling.

    Everybody loves a screamer cartridge.



    Wolfe Publishing Group