feature By: Patrick Meitin | October, 20


Why $200? When the 1934 National Firearms Act (NFA) was enacted by Democrats, this sum represented about $3,850 adjusted to 2020 inflation. This was devised to monetarily discourage ownership, ironically allowing only bootleggers and organized crime figures to afford them; characters the legislation was purportedly devised to thwart.

I’ll not waste space covering procedural details here, as your dealer will walk you through each step. In basic terms, you’ll first purchase your suppressor from a federally-licensed dealer, as its serial number is required on federal paperwork. The “can” remains in the dealer’s safe after submitting your application. Paperwork includes Form 4 filled out in triplicate, three passport photos, official fingerprint cards (produced by your county sheriff) and a check for $200, payable to Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATF). You then await approval. By any reasonable metric in a computerized world, this would require a month to complete. In the universe of federal bureaucracy, nine to 14 months is required. Suppressors can also be placed in a trust, allowing transfer between assigned trustees, who must also pass background checks.
Suppressors are currently legal in 42 states. The nine excluded from the list are dominated by politicians inclined to restrict Constitutional rights – California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont. There were recent rumblings of making suppressor ownership no more difficult than passing a gun purchase National Instant Criminal Background Check Systems (NICS) check. Sadly, bill-friendly congressional RINOs (Republicans in Name Only) developed cold feet following the mass shooting in Las Vegas in 2017 and the mainstream media’s labeling the legislation “The Assassin’s Bill,” in the same way AR’s became “weapons of war.” There weren’t enough votes to justify moving the bill forward and it quickly faded away.
Fact & Fiction

My varmint rifles typically featured muzzle brakes due to my penchant for high-magnification scopes. Even tiny degrees of muzzle jump made marking shots difficult. Brakes tame scope movement but also introduce obnoxious muzzle blast. My 6mm Remington rockchuck rifle and bottleneck-cartridge T/C pistols, in particular, induced migraines after shooting too many rounds. Suppressors provide muzzle brake action (about 65/75 percent effect of best-quality brakes) while eliminating head-crushing muzzle blast.
Concerns
The ability to disassemble suppressors for cleaning is vital with rimfire “cans,” as 22 LR powders, in particular, are downright dirty. Even with centerfire cans, I prefer segmented designs or removable baffles/mono-cores to better facilitate eventual cleaning.

Bulk and weight are another consideration. Aluminum is lightweight, for instance, but more care is required to avoid galling threads. Applying high-quality grease to all aluminum threads is a good precaution. Titanium includes similar mass and is obviously stronger, but also expensive, while steel automatically adds weight but proves indestructible. If you can afford only one suppressor, standard 308 centerfire models are a sound choice. While .224 to 6.5mm caliber-specific cans are offered (sometimes more affordably), 308 options prove most versatile, as most are rated to 300 Winchester Magnum, should you find the need.
An obvious apprehension after receiving my first suppressor was whether it would alter harmonics and point of impact on established rifle/handload combinations. My initial suppressor experiences, shooting prairie dogs in eastern Montana, erased any accuracy worries. Still, for this article I gathered a variety of suppressors and tested them for accuracy with a variety of proven varmint rifles and loads, from 22 LR to 6mm Creedmoor.
During that first suppressor-equipped Montana foray I also noted that not all suppressors are created equal. The friend who shared that trip owns a suppressor retailing for twice as much as my Rebel Silencers SOS Hunter model, but mine was conspicuously quieter. So, for this article I used a smartphone decibel meter app (undoubtedly not dead-nuts accurate, but offering apples to apples comparisons) to quantify actual noise reduction measured from the shooter’s position, starting with an unmuffled rifle and then shooting various suppressors and ammunition and noting noise reduction.
It should be noted that the decibel scale is based on orders of magnitude on a logarithmic scale and is decidedly nonlinear, making it a bit confusing. For instance, if total silence is 0 dB, a sound 10 times louder is 10 dB, a sound 100 times louder is 20 dB and a sound 1,000 times louder is 30 dB, and so on. By this system human conversation, at 60 dB, and a jet fighter taking off 100 feet away, about 130 dB, are separated by only 70 dB despite the latter being 1,000s of times louder. From the shooter’s position behind an unsuppressed rifle, an average 22 LR round shot from an 18.5-inch barrel produces around 85 dB, or only 5 dB louder than a busy restaurant. This also means the difference between an unsuppressed 85/86 dB rifle report and an 80/81 dB suppressed shot is more significant than would appear on paper. Keep that in mind while perusing the accompanying table.
Testing

With my heavy barreled 22 LR average groups were .79, .85 and .84 inch for unsuppressed, Little Crow Gunworks Boom Tube and Huntertown Arms Guardian 22 suppressor, respectively – which actually represents pretty consistent 22 LR performance. With my custom AR, average groups measured .93 inch unsuppressed, .96 inch with the Boom Tube, .93 with a Rebel SOS Hunter Suppressor, .96 with a Huntertown Arms Chameleon 308 titanium can and .79 inch with Gemtech’s Trek-II.

Noise Reduction

Adding Little Crow Gunworks’ ½x28 Bang Tube, in general, resulted in 1 dB noise reduction (3 dB with Aguila loads). The Bang Tube is not a suppressor, so doesn’t involve Type 4 paperwork. Instead it’s an open-ended, milled-aluminum tube that threads to the muzzle and funnels muzzle blast downrange. It proves remarkably effective when recording decibels from the shooter’s perspective, and costs only $50. Surprisingly, it created much the same effect as my $250 Huntertown Arms Guardian 22 rimfire suppressor.
I chose my parts-build AR-15 in 223 Remington instead of my threaded 223 bolt rifle because ARs are notoriously noisy. Though, with its fairly heavy 20-inch barrel, this AR produced about the same perceived noise – from the shooter’s position – as my 22 LR. Loads included Browning BXV 50-grain Varmint Expanding, American Eagle 50-grain JHP, Hornady Varmint Express 55-grain V-MAX, handloaded 50-grain Rocky Mountain Reloading lead-free frangible (24.5 grains of H-322, CCI BR-2 primers and PMC brass) and handloaded Berger 85.5-grain Long Range Hybrid Target bullets (21.5 grains of Ramshot TAC, Federal AR Match primers and Winchester brass).
The Little Crow Boom Tube produced worthwhile results with the AR, reducing decibels 2.5 dB with the Browning ammunition, 2 dB with the American Eagle load and Berger-bullet handload, 3 dB with Hornady’s load and only 1 dB with the 50-grain load. Again, pretty impressive for a $50 item requiring no tedious paperwork or long approval times.

A compact Gemtech Trek-II, engineered specifically for .223 ARs, resulted in 3 dB noise reduction with Browning and Hornady loads, 4 dB reduction with a 50-grain handload, 2.5 dB reduction with American Eagle loads and a 2 dB reduction with the Berger handload. The titanium Huntertown Chameleon didn’t do quite as well, resulting in muzzle noise 2.5 dB quieter with Browning ammunition, 2 dB quieter with the American Eagle, Hornady and the Berger handload and 3 dB quieter with the 50-grain handload.


